• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Ask NCSI
  • Subscribe to NCSI News
NCSI WestEd logo

National Center for Systemic Improvement

Strengthening State Capacity to Realize Positive Outcomes for Students with Disabilities

  • How We Can Help
    • Effective Instruction
    • General Supervision
    • IDEA Fiscal Management
    • SEA Leadership (SEAL)
  • Resources
    • Resource Library
    • Collections
    • Learning Collaboratives
    • Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS)
    • Glossary of Common Terms and Acronyms
    • Ask NCSI
  • Find Liaison
    • Find Your State Liaison
    • Technical Assistance Services
  • News & Events
  • About Us
    • NCSI Staff
    • Our Partners

Checklist for Assessing the State General Supervision System

November 18, 2024 by Tanner Petry

On July 24, 2023, the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) released its “State General Supervision Responsibilities Under Parts B and C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Monitoring, Technical Assistance, and Enforcement, Questions and Answers 23-01.”

The guidance (referred to as OSEP QA 23-01) outlines OSEP’s expectations for reasonably designed state general supervision and monitoring systems and supersedes (as well as consolidates) previously issued OSEP guidance. This resource is designed to support state
educational agency (SEA) staff in assessing their general supervision and monitoring systems, policies, procedures, and practices against the expectations outlined in OSEP QA 23-01. The resource is focused on Part B responsibilities under IDEA and is organized around the five sections of OSEP QA 23-01. Each of the five sections, (State General Supervision Responsibilities, Identification and Correction of Noncompliance, State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR), State Annual Determinations, and State Enforcement Through Determinations and Other Methods), delineates between expectations that are required versus recommended.

Filed Under: Featured on Home

Leading by Convening: Rubrics to Assess and Shape Practice

October 10, 2024 by Judah Nagler

A rubric is a coherent set of criteria that includes descriptions of levels of performance quality on the criteria. (ASCD, 2013) In the Leading by Convening (LbC) Blueprint, rubrics describe the behavior of systems, leaders and stakeholders as they build authentic engagement.

Rubrics are often said to be ‘as good as their description.’ In LbC, all rubrics have been written by a diverse group of stakeholders with a wide variety of experiences in leading and participating in collaborative efforts. Through this process, these rubrics uniquely capture and present the stakeholder experience in system collaboration.

As written, rubrics are descriptive, not evaluative. But, when used to compare current levels of interaction against those described in the rubric, they provide a useful way to assess interaction and deepening levels of engagement.

Download the Blueprint

Leaders have used the LbC Blueprint, tools, and learning activities with success across state and local settings.

Working together for more than 15 years to move research and policy into practice, IDEA partners agreed that collective influence has the potential to change outcomes. Learn how to engage decision-makers, practitioners, and consumers in ways that lead to unified action.

Download the Blueprint

Building Support Through Data

Sharing data is not the same as building support through data. Building support requires dialogue, exchange, shared meaning and the commitment to joint messaging.

Download PDF

Coalescing Around Evidence-Based Practices

Training individuals on an evidence-based practice is not the same as coalescing individuals around that practice. Coalescing demands an exploration of the issue from the perspective of the implementers and stakeholders.

Download PDF

Creating Active Engagement

Engagement differs meaningfully from participation. Although increasing participation builds the working relationships necessary for change and sustainability.

Download PDF

Stakeholder Engagement in Evaluation

Stakeholders can be valuable allies in creating evaluations that tap into local practice and use the expertise of implementers and stakeholders to inform mid-course decisions and impact lasting change.

Download PDF

The RDA/SSIP rubrics

Four new rubrics were developed to support LbC as a tool in Results Driven Accountability (RDA) and the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP). Stakeholder engagement is a core principle in Results Driven Accountability (RDA) and State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP). Each of the rubrics addresses an aspect of engagement that can help states increase stakeholder participation and build active engagement.

Using the LbC Rubrics

Each LbC rubric describes a set of observable behaviors focused on a change in the practice of authentic stakeholder engagement. The rubrics can be used by teams to:

  • discuss authentic engagement from the viewpoint of the stakeholders;
  • assess current levels of interaction;
  • guide future interaction;
  • routinely assess changes in perception and practice; and
  • chronicle changes in outcomes as engagement deepens.

Rubrics typically list criteria in the left column and describe levels of performance in columns moving to the right. This arrangement creates cells that describe the performance at each level for each criterion. In the LbC rubrics, the criterion column is called an “operational decision.” Operational decisions result when a team examines both the technical and adaptive aspects of the change it envisions and defines several important aspects of interaction that will require attention.

Each rubric is interactive. Follow the image below to see how you can interact with the rubrics as you move towards greater depths of interaction.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leading by Convening Module 5: Reviewing and Reflecting on Engagement Over Time

October 10, 2024 by Judah Nagler

Related Resources

  • A Quick Chronology of Engagement
    It is helpful for groups to look back on their work together and to tell the story of their engagement. Use this tool to develop and reflect on the chronology of your group’s engagement and describe the value of your work together.
  • Give Value First
    Do you have expectations as you enter a learning partnership? Use this tool to rethink how expectations shape a potential partnership.
  • Your Brand
    Your brand is not your content, your logo or your website. It’s what your stakeholders perceive about you, and how you make them feel. Use this tool to build your brand.
  • Measuring Progress
    The value of relationships is hard to describe and even more difficult to measure. Use this tool to identify and quantify the value of relationships as strategy.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leading by Convening Module 4: Doing the Work Together

October 10, 2024 by Judah Nagler

Related Resources

  • Building Engagement
    Anybody can deliver information. Stakeholders want engagement. Use this tool to generate learning activities around an issue.
  • Dialogue Guide Facilitator Handbook
    Dialogue Guides are intended to promote dialogue centered on an issue of high interest to the education community. This Dialogue Guide Facilitator Handbook was written to assist facilitators in carrying out Dialogue Guide activities.
  • Defining Our Core
    Leaders often need to describe work in straightforward ways that are understandable to potential partners and the public. Use this tool to express your driving purpose and share it simply with others.
  • Two Way Learning
    While formal systems often communicate through a one-way process, interaction demands a two-way process. Use this tool to transform one-way processes into two-way learning activities.
  • Doing the Work Together Rubric
    This rubric is correlated with the four big ideas of Doing the Work Together. It describes what collaborators do and develop together during their initial efforts of collaboration to deep indicators of partnership.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leading by Convening Module 3: Ensuring Relevant Participation

October 10, 2024 by Judah Nagler

Related Resources

  • What’s in It for Me?
    Participation does not mean involvement. Use this tool to engage people, encourage interactions, exchange views and form opinions about the personal and professional value of continuing to engage.
  • Engaging Everybody
    Talk to a group about engaging the full range of stakeholders and predictably you hear, “We will have 200 people at every meeting.” This is a real fear; but is it a real problem? Use this tool to create manageable ways to involve everybody.
  • Learn the Language: Make the Connection
    Different groups often have different ways of talking about the issues they share. Use this tool to help your stakeholders define key ideas and cross walk vocabulary, programs, and funding streams that are important to their work.
  • Web of Connections
    Different groups often articulate various positions and perspectives about a shared issue. Use this tool called Web of Connections to identify groups and agencies that have shared interests. This tool enables leaders to consider what the issue looks like from the perspective of potential partners.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leading by Convening Module 2: Coalescing Around Issues

October 10, 2024 by Judah Nagler

Related Resources

  • How People Are
    Change is hard for most people. This tool will help leaders prepare for some of the most predictable challenges.
  • Four Simple Questions
    Leaders cannot avoid complexity but can make it less complicated. This tool will help leaders create an inclusive path to shared work.
  • Seeds of Trust
    Stakeholders will take in messages about a leader’s sincerity in both direct and indirect ways. Little things convey a lot. Use this tool to identify small changes leaders can make to build trust.
  • Meet the Stakeholders
    For every issue, there are a number of groups that have deep and durable connections at the practice level. Use this tool to reach out and identify potential partners.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 22
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Newsletter signup

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Menu

  • Home
  • How We Can Help
  • Resources
  • Find Liaison
  • News & Events
  • About Us

NCSI Partners

  • WestEd
  • American Institutes for Research (AIR)
  • National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE)
  • Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk at the University of Texas at Austin
Site and contents © 2025 WestEd. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Accessibility

This NCSI website was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs contract No. H326R240001. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service, or enterprise mentioned on this website is intended or should be inferred.